From: Tom Fitzpatrick (tfitz@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Mar 01 1999 - 11:50:01 PST
BAD MSG:
Hi All,
-Lines: 24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Length: 677
X-Status: $$$$
X-UID: 0000000846
Status: RO
We got this question from a customer, and I can't quite tell what the Spec
says about it. At the very least, this means we need to clean up Section
12, unless someone can point out to me where this is addressed in the Spec.
Thanks,
-Tom
Here's the question:
module top;
reg a;
sub i1(.IN(a)); // OK in VXL/NCV, IEEE compliant
sub i2(.in(a)); // OK in VXL/NCV, not IEEE compliant (customer's view)
endmodule
module sub (.IN(in));
input in;
endmodule
<p>The module definition for sub is using explicit port naming in the port
list definition. The customer is saying they think the explicit port
connection shown in the i2 instance of module sub is not 1364 compliant. Is
it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:53:26 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.