From: James A. Markevitch (jam@magic.com)
Date: Tue Jan 18 2000 - 16:19:27 PST
Here are some more comments on the Draft 4 BNF.
Section A.7.4
In the definition of full_edge_sensitive_path_description, the second
occurrence of list_of_path_inputs should be list_of_path_outputs.
Section A.7.5.2
In the definitions of delayed_data and delayed_reference, shouldn't the
square brackets be in bold?
Section A.7.5.2
In the definition of timing_check_limit, should it be defined as expression
or constant_expression?
Section A.7.5.3
In the definition of scalar_timing_check_condition, should it be defined
using expression or constant_expression?
Section A.9.3
In the definition of escaped_arrayed_identifier, shouldn't the inner set
of square brackets be in bold?
Section A.9.3
In the definition of escaped_hierarchical_identifier, the square brackets
enclosing the curly braces are redundant and should be removed.
Section A.9.3
In the definition of simple_arrayed_identifier, the square brackets should
be in bold.
Section A.7.4 and A.9.3
edge_identifier is defined in two different places and is defined to have
two different meanings. I believe that it should be removed from A.9.3.
Section A.8.1
In genvar_concatenation and genvar_multiple_concatenation, shouldn't
genvar_expression be used instead of expression?
Section A.6.4
There is no definition for procedural_timing_control_statement anywhere
in the BNF.
Section A.3.3
There is no definition for scalar_expression anywhere in the BNF.
James Markevitch
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:54:10 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.