Re: BTF Attribute proposal

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Sat Feb 12 2000 - 13:38:12 PST


> Here are some arguments in favor of putting the attributes in the middle of
> function calls, instead of at the end. I.e. support:
>
> z = func_name (* mode="hardmacro" *) (arg1, arg2);
>
> 1. This attaches the attribute to the "operator" just as for unary, binary,
> and conditional operators. In this case, the "operator" is the function
> itself. This also keeps the attribute close to the function name which
> probably makes intuitive sense to the user.

This "operator" argument is good enough to quiet most of my qualms.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:54:12 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.