From: Adam Krolnik (krolnik@lsil.com)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2001 - 07:36:13 PDT
Good morning;
I do believe there was evidence that this was thought of and seen.
Consider this mail fragment (from grep) which was from, Adam Krolnik.
Seeing this is for UDP's it is not that far of a leap to consider
this for modules too.
WAS:
udp_output_declaration ::=
output port_identifier;
| output reg port_identifier [= constant_expression];
udp_input_declaration ::=
input list_of_port_identifiers;
udp_instatiation ::= udp_identifier [drive_strength] [delay2]
udp_instance {, udp_instance} ;
PROPOSED IS:
udp_output_declaration ::=
output [attribute_instance] port_identifier;
| output reg [attribute_instance] port_identifier [=
constant_expression];
udp_input_declaration ::=
input [attribute_instance] list_of_port_identifiers;
udp_instatiation ::= udp_identifier [drive_strength] [delay2]
[attribute_instance] udp_instance {, udp_instance} ;
PROPOSED CHANGE:
<p> Adam Krolnik
Verification Mgr.
LSI Logic Corp.
Plano TX. 75074
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:54:45 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.