From: Clifford E. Cummings (cliffc@sunburst-design.com)
Date: Tue Sep 25 2001 - 14:28:20 PDT
Precedence: bulk
Maq, Yatin -
I just noticed that Nonblocking, spelled correctly in section 5.6.4 and
everywhere else in both the 1364-1995 Standard and Draft 5 of the 2001
Standard, is spelled as two different words (Non blocking) in Draft 6 of
the 1364-2001 Standard. We went to great lengths to remove all of the
inconsistencies in the 1364-2001 text and BNF so that people would quit
misspelling this as non-blocking (the 1364-1995 BNF had this misspelling in
a couple of places).
Please tell me that it is spelled nonblocking in the standard that is being
released by the IEEE (I don't want to fight yet a third spelling of
nonblocking for the next X years).
How did Draft 6 get changed? I did not even think to look at the spelling
of nonblocking in Draft 6 since we did not ask for this change. This is
very frustrating.
Regards - Cliff
At 02:14 PM 9/24/01 -0700, you wrote:
>Andy,
>
>Can you update me on the status of this? We have been waiting a long
>time for this.
>
>
>Rgds,
>
>
>Maq
>
>Andrew Ickowicz wrote:
> >
> > Maq,
> >
> > Working feverishly to get this completed, but am still not quite
> > done. My hope right now is next week. Thanks for keeping in touch and
> > sincere apologies for the delay(s).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Andy
> >
> > >Andy,
> > >
> > >Did you complete work on the 1364 document? I am still waiting
> > >for your PDF file.
> > >
> > >
> > >Rgds,
> > >
> > >
> > >Maq
//*****************************************************************//
// Cliff Cummings Phone: 503-641-8446 //
// Sunburst Design, Inc. FAX: 503-641-8486 //
// 14314 SW Allen Blvd. E-mail: cliffc@sunburst-design.com //
// PMB 501 Web: www.sunburst-design.com //
// Beaverton, OR 97005 //
// //
// Expert Verilog, Synthesis and Verification Training //
//*****************************************************************//
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:54:46 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.