Re: errata/68: Missing objects from VPI attribute object diagram

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 01:50:11 PST


Precedence: bulk

Just as a side note, this database was originally labelled, I think, as part of
the BTF work, which is only part of 1364, but since it is the only errata
database in 1364 I know of, I agree it should list all known errata.

The only problem I have with this is that the mail distribution list from this
database is the BTF, whereas an erratum like this should go to the PLI TF.

Maybe we should change the mail list to include the 1364 core list as well as
the BTF ?

Shalom

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 drm@xilinx.com wrote:

> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:36:47 -0800
> From: drm@xilinx.com
> To: btf-bugs@boyd.com
> Subject: errata/68: Missing objects from VPI attribute object diagram
>
> Precedence: bulk
>
>
> >Number: 68
> >Category: errata
> >Originator: Dennis Marsa
> >Description:
>
> In Section 26.6.42, which shows the VPI object diagram
> for "attribute" objects, the following VPI objects are
> missing from the dotted class on the left side of the
> diagram:
>
> "iodecl"
> "cont assign"
> "defparam"
>
> Each of these types of objects can have attributes
> attached to them according to the BNF of Annex A.
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                           Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Principal Staff Engineer                               Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                    Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                       Cell: +972 50 441478


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 12:55:34 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.