From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:20:33 PDT
Precedence: bulk
Minutes of BTF Meeting July 28, 2003
Meeting started at 10:45 Pacific Time
In attendence:
Karen Pieper
Kurt Baty
Tom Fitzpatrick
Michael McNamara
Brad Pierce
Stu Sutherland
Jay Lawrence
Francoise Martinolle
Stefen Boyd
Dennis Brophy
Passed minutes from July 14, 2003
Kurt wanted to comment that less than half of the features added in
AMS are specific to analog. Kurt had also e-mailed a question about
the technical problems associated with operator overloading. Steven
suggested that we wait until Gordon Vreugdenhil and other potential
implementors had a chance to fully consider and describe the issues.
Stefen raised issue of funding for Web page development. Dennis Brophy
and Michael McNamara commented on the procedures for funding via IEEE
or DASC. There was concern about the complexity of funding through
those channels, and the possibility of funds not being used as the
donator desired. Direct funding was discussed also. None of the
participants knew of any legal, procedural or ethical concerns with
direct funding to Stefen from corporations. There was further discussion
of possible funding approaches, but in the short term, Stefen is asking
for direct funding by any interested parties.
Steven raised the question of how to organize efforts going forward.
Members with historical experience with the process suggested that
sub-task forces be formed to make proposals for specific enhancements.
A question was raised as to whether we should proceed under the
assumption that SystemVerilog would be donated early enough for
this standardization effort or not. The question was also raised
as to whether equivalent features could be donated without an
Accellera donation. Jay expressed the opinion that features that
were not new in SystemVerilog (e.g. features directly copied from
other existing languages) could be donated without any problems, but
that truly new features might require more caution.
A concern was raised that independent sub-task forces might follow
inconsistent philosophies for what mechanisms should be used in extending
the language. This started discussion of the desirability of an
overarching design guidelines or philosophy to guide the efforts of
the various enhancement sub-task forces. Eventually, a proposal was
made to form a sub-task force to develop such a set of design guidelines
and propose it to the BTF. This was approved unanimously. Jay, Stu,
Fitz and Steven volunteered for this group. Jay will lead the effort,
and will make arrangements for starting discussions. It was noted that
this effort is largely independent of the results of the user survey,
and can go on while waiting for those results.
Kurt proposed that we provide a template for enhancement sub-task forces
to fill in to summarize design issues with their designs (e.g. any new
keywords added). It was pointed out that this should be a follow-on to
the design philosophy proposal, as the contents of that proposal would
affect what kinds of issues should appear in the template.
Steven relayed that Scott Cranston is working on getting clarifications
of the AMS-related enhancement requests. Kurt asked whether we could get
more participation from other vendors working on Verilog-AMS. There were
no responses from other vendor representatives. Kurt always has the option
of making specific enhancement requests himself.
Nobody had any other issues to raise, and the meeting was adjourned.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 12:22:08 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.