From: William Paulsen (paulsen@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 07:24:40 PST
I suspect that these guidelines that restrict standards discussions
apply only during official IEEE standards meetings.
I think it would be difficult to restrict casual email discussions, such
as here.
Indeed, if email discussions must follow the restriction guidelines,
then I would think that other informal discussions that occur outside
IEEE meetings must also be restricted - such as informal discussions in
hallways, for example, or even private emails.
But how can these informal discussions be enforced?
Bill Paulsen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clifford E. Cummings [mailto:cliffc@sunburst-design.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:39 PM
> To: btf@boyd.com; vfv@eda.org
> Subject: Re: More problems with your Apology...
>
>
> Hi, All -
>
> Please forgive me but I can't find the "second round of distribution"
> mentioned by Alec and referenced by Mac. I know my original
> email to the
> btf and vfv reflectors had bad content but I cannot find the second
> offending email (unless it is my response to Mac's email
> where I replied
> and kept his comments about my original bad references??)
>
> Please let me know what the "second round of distribution" is
> referring to.
> I promise I will appropriately apologize for that content too.
>
> I guess I need a generic EDA company to write me a generic
> linting tool to
> lint my emails for generic offensive content before I forward
> comments to
> the generic standards reflectors (this is getting way too
> complicated!)
>
> Regards - Cliff
>
> At 03:28 PM 3/23/2004, Michael McNamara wrote:
>
> >And, as I pointed out in the meeting, these guidelines are
> not based on
> >whether one works for, or does not work for any company.
> >
> >Also these guidelines really have nothing to do with the
> bylaws of the
> >IEEE-SA; instead they have to do with the laws of the United States.
> >
> >The IEEE-SA formed these guidelines (you could think of them
> as Design
> >Rules) for us so as to provide a framework where we can operate as a
> >standards group while remaining at all times in compliance with the
> >laws of the United States.
> >
> >-- On Mar 23 2004 at 10:48, Alec Stanculescu sent a message:
> > > To: alec@f4.fintronic.com, btf@boyd.com, vfv@eda.org
> > > Subject: "Apology!"
> > > Cliff,
> > >
> > > After apologizing, you included the offending statements for a
> >second
> > > round of distribution!
> > >
> > > And, just to keep the record straight, are you stating
> that you never
> > > received money from any company selling EDA tools?
> > >
> > > Alec Stanculescu
> > >
> > > > Hi, All -
> > > >
> > > > My bad! I don't work for an company that sells EDA
> tools and I
> > > > forgot the new bylaws that forbid mention of companies and
> > > > product plans. I will refrain from mentioning companies in
> > > > future discussions.
> > > >
> > > > I hope the issues I raised do not get lost in my
> poor presentation
> > of same.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, all!
> > > >
> > > > Regards - Cliff
> > > >
> > > > At 06:49 AM 3/23/2004, Michael McNamara wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >-- On Mar 18 2004 at 18:01, Clifford E. Cummings
> sent a message:
> > > > > > To: btf@boyd.com, vfv@eda.org
> > > > > > Subject: "RE: PSL: Attributes for Verilog and
> SystemVerilog"
> > > > > > Hi, All -
> > > > >...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design, Inc.
> 14314 SW Allen Blvd., PMB 501, Beaverton, OR 97005
> Phone: 503-641-8446 / FAX: 503-641-8486
> cliffc@sunburst-design.com / www.sunburst-design.com Expert
> Verilog, SystemVerilog, Synthesis and Verification Training
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 07:12:10 PST
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.