Re: Corrected proposal for uwire

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Nov 29 2004 - 14:54:22 PST

  • Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: Corrected proposal for uwire"

    Based on the responses by Jim and Chas, it sounds like we should accept
    the change that Shalom proposed, to keep the numbering of vpiNone the same.

    This could be considered to be one of the reorderings that Shalom proposed,
    which were approved as amendments to the proposal. If not, then the PTF
    may need to fix it. I have been asked to file a Mantis report on this, to
    make sure it is dealt with.

    Steven Sharp
    sharp@cadence.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 29 2004 - 14:41:21 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.