Re: [Fwd: IEEEE 1364-2005 Encryption draft with consensus changes (fwd)]

From: Steven J. Dovich (dovich@cadence.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 07:40:38 PST

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com: "Re: IEEE 1364-2005 Encryption draft with consensus changes"

    I think that text should be deleted. There is not a corresponding
    entry in I.1.2.1 "Encryption Input" and the appearance of such a
    specification in the output would require some undocumented source
    for that request. Further, the viewport reference is not substantive
    to the point of the flow example.

    Thanks for the careful read that caught this...

    /sjd

    > Another question:
    >
    > In Annex I, at the end of I.1.2.2, there is "viewport.".
    >
    > According to Clause 28, the syntax of viewport is
    >
    > viewport=(object=<string>, access=<string>)
    >
    > So what should appear here in Annex I?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Shalom

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 13 2005 - 07:24:36 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.