FW: New Mantis Issue #667 for V-1364

From: Fitzpatrick, Tom (tom_fitzpatrick@mentorg.com)
Date: Thu Apr 14 2005 - 11:09:24 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com: "Re: FW: New Mantis Issue #667 for V-1364"

     
    Hi Gang,

    Received another issue for us to consider for 1364. Please take a look
    and respond via email by Monday, 4/18 at the latest. I'll be on the road
    on Monday, so please be sure to copy Neil (Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM) on
    your vote as well.

    Thanks,
    -Tom

    Tom Fitzpatrick W:(978)448-8797
    tfitz@model.com C: (978)337-7641

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Maidment, Matthew R [mailto:matthew.r.maidment@intel.com]
    Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:02 AM
    To: Fitzpatrick, Tom
    Cc: Karen Pieper
    Subject: New Mantis Issue #667 for V-1364

    Hi Tom.

    In considering a respose to P1800 ballot issue, STU1, the SV-BC believes
    that the issue would be more appropriately addressed by the 1364
    committee.

    The issue points out that there is a not enough information to define
    the order of evaluation of processes during time 0.
    The SV-BC recommends the addition of the following, likely in Clause
    5.6:

    "Combinational constructs including continuous assignments and
    combinational primitives shall execute at least once during time 0."

    Would appreciate the 1364 committee's consideration in this matter.

    I have entered it in the SVDB as issue #667.

    If you have questions please let me.

    Thanks,

    Matt 

    --
Matt Maidment
mmaidmen@ichips.intel.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 10:46:46 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.