RE: FW: New Mantis Issue #667 for V-1364

From: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Date: Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:57:09 PDT

  • Next message: Dave Rich: "RE: FW: New Mantis Issue #667 for V-1364"

    Matt,

    I don't know what you mean by "combinational built-in primitives" vs.
    "built-in gates". All of the "built-in gates" (as far as I remember) are
    "combinational" in the sense that their outputs are functions of their
    current inputs only. They have no memory.

    Gates were explicitly mentioned in my original ballot comment, I think.
    I just forgot to re-mention them later on.
    There is no essential difference between a gate and a continuous
    assignment (except for strength reduction).

    Shalom

    On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Maidment, Matthew R wrote:

    > I can agree that combinational construct is not defined.
    > It was meant to capture those processes whose semantics
    > represent combinational logic. The combinational primitives
    > was an attempt to cover
    >
    > combinational UDPs
    > combinational built-in primitives
    > continuous assignments
    >
    > It does not include sequential primities or many/most
    > of the built-in gates. 

    -- 
Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com                     Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 19:34:44 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.