Re: [sv-ec] Re: [sv-bc] potential command line option

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:33:32 PDT

  • Next message: Steven Sharp: "More on configs"

    Steve Meyer wrote:
    > I thought we had already agreed to this. Cver follows XL and does
    >not allow configs in source files. Allowing configs in source files
    >(made even worse if `defines are allowed) is not algorithmically correct
    >in the sense that circularities occur.

    Steve,

    Can you provide more details about such problems? The only thing I
    can think of is the issue of how to figure out the top-level modules
    or config in the traditional one-pass use-model where the tool is
    expected to figure this out for itself.

    Steven Sharp
    sharp@cadence.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 25 2005 - 22:09:53 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.