Re: errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 15:44:45 PDT

• Next message: sharp@cadence.com: "errata/84: Should @* include delay controls?"
• Previous message: Steven Sharp: "Re: errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Maybe in reply to: drm@xilinx.com: "errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Next in thread: Michael McNamara: "RE: errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Precedence: bulk

Oh, and I decided not to include identifiers appearing in delay controls in
the implicit event list. Or identifiers from repeat counts on intra-assignment
event controls (e.g. i from "a <= repeat(i) @(b) c;" does not get included).

Steven Sharp
sharp@cadence.com

• Next message: sharp@cadence.com: "errata/84: Should @* include delay controls?"
• Previous message: Steven Sharp: "Re: errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Maybe in reply to: drm@xilinx.com: "errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Next in thread: Michael McNamara: "RE: errata/82: Section 9.7.5: Description of @*, @(*) incomplete"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:26 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.