From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 01:20:03 PDT
Precedence: bulk
The following reply was made to PR errata/85; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
To: sharp@cadence.com
Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Subject: Re: enhancement/85: repeat event_control grammar ambiguity
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 11:15:43 +0300
sharp@cadence.com wrote:
> In fact, a repeated event control is only possible as an
> intra-assignment timing control. A repeat elsewhere will
> be parsed as a loop_statement.
It looks like this problem goes back to 1364-1995.
The solution I suggest is:
procedural_timing_control ::=
delay_control
| event_control
procedural_timing_control_statement ::=
procedural_timing_control statement_or_null
Note that procedural_timing_control_statement is explicitly
mentioned in the text only in 9.7.5, nor does it appear in any of the
syntax
boxes in the body of the standard.
Shalom
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:27 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.