assign out = mem[index] ;

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Sat Aug 03 2002 - 21:41:26 PDT

• Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/84: Should @* include delay controls?"
• Previous message: Matt Maidment: "errata/89: Errata: Multiple Attribute Instances in BNF"
• Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I need an urgent answer to the following question:

What is the behavior of the continuous assignment

assign out = mem[index] ;

Is it sensitive to index or to mem[index] ?

That is, if mem[index] changes while index stays constant,
is out updated ?

Mac claims it is.

For some reason, there is a doubt in my mind.

I don't have the standard with me,
nor convenient access to different simulators.

Yes, I know we've been discussing it lately,
that's why the question came up in my mind.
It's urgent because 1364.1 uses that structure for RAM modeling.

Sorry for bothering you.

Thanks,
Shalom

• Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/84: Should @* include delay controls?"
• Previous message: Matt Maidment: "errata/89: Errata: Multiple Attribute Instances in BNF"
• Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: assign out = mem[index] ;"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:27 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.