errata/91: Noe 7 in section 26.6.5 is misleading

From: chas@cadence.com
Date: Wed Aug 07 2002 - 13:21:15 PDT

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "ETF: additional 1364-2001 errata reported Jan-Apr 2002"
• Previous message: Stefen Boyd: "Re: [Fwd: enhancement/90: 19:unclear which compiler directives must be alone on line]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Precedence: bulk

>Number: 91
>Category: errata
>Originator: Charles Dawson
>Environment:

>Description:

The note says that both vpiHighConn _and_ vpiLowConn will
be NULL if the port is unconnected. This is not exactly
true. If it is a NULL port (ie module M();) then the
lowconn (at least) will be NULL. If the instance of M
also does not connect to the port, then the highconn will
be NULL as well. This is what the note was intended to
convey, but it doesn't do a very good job.

• Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "ETF: additional 1364-2001 errata reported Jan-Apr 2002"
• Previous message: Stefen Boyd: "Re: [Fwd: enhancement/90: 19:unclear which compiler directives must be alone on line]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:27 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.