unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?

From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 09:38:22 PDT

• Next message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Previous message: Brad Pierce: "RE: errata/139: 19.3.1 miscellaneous small errata"
• Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: James A. Markevitch: "RE: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "RE: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Precedence: bulk

Why is 'unsigned' (discussed in section 4.5) a keyword in Annex B? Is there
a fundamental difference between $unsigned() and $setup(), $hold(),
$recovery(), etc.?

-- Brad

• Next message: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Previous message: Brad Pierce: "RE: errata/139: 19.3.1 miscellaneous small errata"
• Next in thread: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Reply: Gordon Vreugdenhil: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "Re: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: James A. Markevitch: "RE: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Maybe reply: Steven Sharp: "RE: unsigned -- why a V2K keyword?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:31 PDT and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.