From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 05:36:41 PDT
We passed the wrong resolution in errata/36.
Specifically, the bad sentence occurs in 9.7.3, on the 4th text line
before Syntax 9-10.
It says, "Its occurrence can be recognized by using the event control
syntax described in ".
It IS fixed in 2ed.
However, the resolution we passed says,
"
2001b still has error (added wrong
reference).
Passed 10/7/02:
REPLACE:
Section 9.7.3:
It can be used in an event
expression to control the execution of
procedural statements in the same
manner as event control
described in. Named events can be
made to occur from a procedure.
WITH:
Section 9.7.3:
It can be used in an event
expression to control the execution of
procedural statements in the same
manner as event control
described in 9.7.2. Named events
can be made to occur from a procedure. "
Stefen, please correct.
I knew I had a funny feeling about this one during the meeting.
Thanks,
Shalom
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478"The devil is in the details."
attached mail follows:
It should be "described in 9.7.2.".
Daryl.Stewart@cl.cam.ac.uk wrote:
At the top of page 144 in P1364/D6 (11/30/01)
Line 4 reads:
Its occurrence can be recognized by using the event control syntax
described in
--************************************************************************ **
Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Tel #: +972 9 9522268
P.O.B. 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Fax #: +972 9 9522890
************************************************************************ **
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 09:24:31 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.