Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk

From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 13:36:40 PST

Next message: Brad Pierce: "errata/210: A.4.1,A.5.4: Why no anonymous module instances?"

Previous message: Stefen Boyd: "Re: issue states"
Next in thread: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Karen,

Below, I've listed a few dozen errata issues that I think are
noncontroversial and just need to be written up in a form that could be
handed on to VSG. Would it be acceptable to develop via e-mail a single
document for this group of noncontroversial issues and then take a single
vote on that document? -- Brad

Next message: Brad Pierce: "errata/210: A.4.1,A.5.4: Why no anonymous module instances?"
Previous message: Stefen Boyd: "Re: issue states"
Next in thread: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Reply: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: Some smaller errata could be dealt with by e-mail and voted on in bulk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Dec 04 2002 - 13:38:53 PST and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.