errata/210: A.4.1,A.5.4: Why no anonymous module instances?

From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 18:47:36 PST

  • Next message: Brad Pierce: "Re: errata/157: 12.3.1, A.1.4, port -- port_expression optional?"

    Precedence: bulk

    >Number: 210
    >Category: errata
    >Originator: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
    >Environment:
    >Description:

    Why can't a module_instance be anonymous, like a udp_instance can be?

    Is this just tradition, or is there a justification for the difference?
    In A.4.1, if the name_of_instance were made optional in module_instance,
    would it cause any harm?

    -- Brad

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Dec 04 2002 - 18:50:29 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.