Re: errata/175: 13.2: file_path_spec syntax and related issues

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 13:40:03 PST

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/254: Table 30 should clarify that LHS can be array word/bit-select/part-select"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/175; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/175: 13.2: file_path_spec syntax and related issues
    Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 23:30:08 +0200 (IST)

     I just noticed that that mail (I don't have access to the exact URL right now)
     started an entire thread. Probably have to split the discussion into subissues.
     
     Anyway, among other things, in that thread, Cliff claimed that the double quotes
     should have been deleted (there was a vote), and that the <> in the include
     syntax is a typo.
     
     Dennis said that will be a problem with names with special characters, such as
     spaces or commas.
     
    > Also see mail from Jayram Bhasker on May 3, 2002, in which he points out that
    > example of file_path_spec in library statement in example in 13.2.1 is without
    > double quotes around the file_path_spec, whereas in the example in 13.7.3, there
    > ARE double quotes.
     
     Shalom
     
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 09 2003 - 13:40:30 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.