- Previous message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: enhancement/220: $random functions not 64-bit portable"
- Maybe in reply to: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "errata/256: red hyperlinked BNF?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Precedence: bulk
The following reply was made to PR errata/256; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: errata/256: red hyperlinked BNF?
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:22:54 +0200
I do intend, however, to produce an updated HTML bnf,
with hyperlinks.
> My suggestion is just to make the terminals bold red without
> the hyperlinks, and only in Annex A, not in the syntax boxes.
- Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "errata/257: Should white space be allowed in hierarchical references?"
- Previous message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: enhancement/220: $random functions not 64-bit portable"
- Maybe in reply to: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "errata/256: red hyperlinked BNF?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 00:30:24 PST
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.