[Fwd: hierarchical_identifier]

From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 01:06:10 PST

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "cleaning up 1364-2001"

    Any comments? Good? Bad? Sheer Boredom? 

    --
Shalom Bresticker                           Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Design & Reuse Methodology                             Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                    Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                       Cell: +972 50 441478

    "The devil is in the details."

    attached mail follows:

    I think it is possible to significantly simplify the BNF of
    hierarchical_identifier and I want to ask if someone sees a problem.

    Specifically, I propose to delete:

    simple_hierarchical_branch
    simple_hierarchical_identifier
    escaped_hierarchical_branch
    escaped_hierarchical_identifier

    and replace hierarchical_identifier with the following:

    hierarchical_identifier ::=
            {identifier ["["unsigned_number"]"] .} identifier

    This seems to me to be the correct way to define it.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 01:07:33 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.