Re: errata/103: PROPOSAL - Index missing

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 01:20:03 PST

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/128: clogb2 still wrong"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/103; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/103: PROPOSAL - Index missing
    Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:13:53 +0200 (IST)

     So far, we have only done corrections and minor additions to the 1364-2001 text.
     
     But if we start adding more major changes, like SystemVerilog stuff,
     then it is a whole different ballgame, requiring a LOT more work.
     
     Shalom
     
     
     On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Shalom Bresticker wrote:
     
    > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 23:51:00 -0800
    > From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    > To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    > Subject: errata/103: PROPOSAL - Index missing
    >
    >
    > Return Index.
    >
    > Work together with IEEE Editor.
    >
    > Index must refer to Subclause #, not page #.
    >
    > Note: there may not be time to add index references to text
    > added in 2001c.
    > http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=103
    >
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 28 2003 - 01:22:36 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.