Re: [sv-bc] SV-EC Proposal: Implicit Universal Data Type - Cliff Cummings to champion the proposal

From: Stefen Boyd (stefen@boyd.com)
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 09:30:46 PST

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "errata/275: 15.2.3, 15.2.6: "timecheck" should be timestamp""

    Precedence: bulk

    Cliff,

    Looks like Stu and I value the opposite parts of your
    proposal...

    I'm not so passionate about avoiding all declarations, so
    avoiding declarations isn't very important to me. But I
    do like the idea of having a single type I can use everywhere
    that morphs between wire (driver resolution) and reg (last
    write wins) is valuable. I prefer making the logic type
    do that since it has become more or less synonymous with reg.

    Admittedly, allowing a single cont. assign to a variable
    get's me 80% of the way there, I just wish we would finish
    the job and add the morphing.

    Stefen

    --------------------
    Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
    stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
    www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 28 2003 - 09:30:32 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.