Re: Voting results for 2/17/03 email vote for ETF

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 11:43:15 PST

  • Next message: Stefen Boyd: "Re: [Fwd: errata/123: PROPOSAL - Fwd: identifier and indexing syntax]"

    Precedence: bulk

    Karen,

    I had no objection for 169.

    I simply observed that one sentence, which said that a certain change should be
    "considered", is covered in 163, and therefore is not part of the proposal for
    169.

    Shalom

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Karen Pieper wrote:

    > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:03:17 -0800
    > From: Karen Pieper <Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com>
    > To: etf@boyd.com
    > Subject: Voting results for 2/17/03 email vote for ETF
    >
    > Hi, all,
    >
    > I have heard issues raised for only 169 and 175 so the rest pass.
    > Stefen, can you update the database?
    >
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/156.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/156.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/160.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/160.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/161.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/161.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/166.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/166.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/168.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/168.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/173.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/173.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/176.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/176.html>
    > http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/179.html
    > <http://www.boyd.com/1364_btf/report/full_pr/179.html>
    >
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > K
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 11:44:24 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.