From: Stefen Boyd (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:08:00 PST
Last meeting I wasn't able to stay on top of changes to
the proposals as well... ideally, what is there can stay
unchanged. Comments below:
At 03:39 PM 2/19/2003 +0200, Shalom Bresticker wrote:
>#123 was passed by etf, but the proposal in the fix field of the database is
Can you point me to the correct version that was passed? I didn't
see anything in the minutes that suggested that it was changed before
>There are other etfpassed issues in which the fix field also requires editing,
>such as deletion of now irrelevant comments, or omission of what is being
Please let me know when you see ones needing revision. I generally
try to eliminate the extra stuff on ones passed during meetings, but
may not get all of it out of email voted issues (there is always the
VSG to fix this before it gets vsgpassed).
>Also, in cases where we make some changes but not others (e.g., because it is
>in another issue), we should note it in the fix field as well, The 'fix' field
>is essentially a 'resolution' field.
>The reader should be able to find a resolution of each comment in the bug
>submission in the fix field.
I agree that it is the final say on how issue was handled. I have
taken the tact that if part of the issue wasn't handled in the fix,
it was deliberate and didn't need a note. If there are ones where you
would like a reference, bring it up. If it's important, these notes
should be part of the proposal.
Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:07:58 PST
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.