Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:48:13 PST
I am going back to the army this morning probably for 4 days.
It will have to wait for next week.
If you are going to dvcon, then look for it when you return.
One immediate comment: in the proposal for 140, the table of examples at the end
should be in <pre> format. Otherwise, it is unreadable.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Stefen Boyd wrote:
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:08:00 -0800
> From: Stefen Boyd <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: errata/123: PROPOSAL - Fwd: identifier and indexing syntax]
> Last meeting I wasn't able to stay on top of changes to
> the proposals as well... ideally, what is there can stay
> unchanged. Comments below:
> At 03:39 PM 2/19/2003 +0200, Shalom Bresticker wrote:
> >#123 was passed by etf, but the proposal in the fix field of the database is
> >still wrong.
> Can you point me to the correct version that was passed? I didn't
> see anything in the minutes that suggested that it was changed before
> >There are other etfpassed issues in which the fix field also requires editing,
> >such as deletion of now irrelevant comments, or omission of what is being
> Please let me know when you see ones needing revision. I generally
> try to eliminate the extra stuff on ones passed during meetings, but
> may not get all of it out of email voted issues (there is always the
> VSG to fix this before it gets vsgpassed).
> >Also, in cases where we make some changes but not others (e.g., because it is
> >dealt with
> >in another issue), we should note it in the fix field as well, The 'fix' field
> >is essentially a 'resolution' field.
> >The reader should be able to find a resolution of each comment in the bug
> >submission in the fix field.
> I agree that it is the final say on how issue was handled. I have
> taken the tact that if part of the issue wasn't handled in the fix,
> it was deliberate and didn't need a note. If there are ones where you
> would like a reference, bring it up. If it's important, these notes
> should be part of the proposal.
> Stefen Boyd Boyd Technology, Inc.
> stefen@BoydTechInc.com (408)739-BOYD
> www.BoydTechInc.com (408)739-1402 (fax)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 19:49:16 PST
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.