From: Steven Sharp (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 16:37:28 PST
I agree with Gord. The fastest full LRM update wouldn't be soon enough for
us anyway. We will be relying on ETF/VSG decisions for our implementations.
Trying to rush out an LRM really won't be much help.
It would be nice to have a publicly available document with the existing
substantive changes in it. This would help keep the vendors who aren't
participating in the process from diverging too far. And if a user questions
an implementation that is based on the decisions so far, it would be nice to
have a semi-official document to provide a de facto standard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 16:38:18 PST
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.