Re: errata/102: PROPOSAL - TOC goes only 1 level down

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:10:06 PST

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "open etf issues"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/102; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/102: PROPOSAL - TOC goes only 1 level down
    Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:02:46 +0200 (IST)

     It appears that the reason that the subclauses of sections 23, 25, 27 do not
     appear in the Table of Contents is not due to a deliberate decision of the IEEE
     editor, but rather due to use of different paragraph format names in those
     chapters. I don't have a copy of the TOC with me, but I will guess that 26.6
     also does not appear, although 26.1-26.5 do.
     
     Making all first-level subclauses use the same paragraph
     formats will automatically cause them to appear in the TOC as well.
     
     Shalom
     
     
    > Generate TOC with 2 levels of subclauses instead of just
    > one. Coordinate with IEEE editor.
    >
    > For discussion:
    > This includes Clauses 23, 25, and 27
    > (PLI routine definitions).
    > The number of subclauses in these clauses is very large.
    > In current IEEE version, the TOC does not include any
    > subclauses of these clauses, although all the other
    > section TOCs includes one level of subclauses.
    > http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=102
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 06 2003 - 12:11:29 PST and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.