Re: errata/325: 12.4 confused on hierarchy for automatics

From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:40:03 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "errata/329: 27.29: vpi_put_data not used in example"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/325; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/325: 12.4 confused on hierarchy for automatics
    Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:31:20 +0300

     URLs below:
     
    > > "Only non-recursively referenced automatic tasks and/or
    > > functions create visible branches that can be referenced.
    > > Recursively called tasks and functions, declared using the
    > > automatic keyword and recursively called from within the
    > > same task or function, do not create visible branches that
    > > can be referenced."
    >
    > This was suggested by Cliff in an email to the BTF on April 23, 1998.
     
     http://boydtechinc.com/btf/archive/btf_1998/0129.html
     
     
    > > "with the exception of items of automatic tasks and
    > > automatic task item declarations. These declarations can
    > > not be accessed by their hierarchical names."
    >
    > This was proposed in an email from Adam Krolnik to the BTF on July 24, 1998.
     
     http://boydtechinc.com/btf/archive/btf_1998/0278.html
     
     
    > In fact, there was an email from a fellow named Steven Sharp on Oct 21, 1999,
    > which fixed the language in Section 10, but seems to have missed parallel
    > language in Section 12.
     
     http://boydtechinc.com/btf/archive/btf_1999/0786.html
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:41:08 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.