From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:40:03 PDT
The following reply was made to PR errata/325; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: errata/325: 12.4 confused on hierarchy for automatics
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:31:20 +0300
> > "Only non-recursively referenced automatic tasks and/or
> > functions create visible branches that can be referenced.
> > Recursively called tasks and functions, declared using the
> > automatic keyword and recursively called from within the
> > same task or function, do not create visible branches that
> > can be referenced."
> This was suggested by Cliff in an email to the BTF on April 23, 1998.
> > "with the exception of items of automatic tasks and
> > automatic task item declarations. These declarations can
> > not be accessed by their hierarchical names."
> This was proposed in an email from Adam Krolnik to the BTF on July 24, 1998.
> In fact, there was an email from a fellow named Steven Sharp on Oct 21, 1999,
> which fixed the language in Section 10, but seems to have missed parallel
> language in Section 12.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 01:41:08 PDT
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.