Re: errata/344: Case Statements with Real Expressions

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 02:50:05 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/344: Case Statements with Real Expressions"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/344; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/344: Case Statements with Real Expressions
    Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 12:44:51 +0300 (IDT)

    > I also tested casex and casez in XL and NC, and reals are allowed there
    > too. Since any X or Z bits disappear during conversion to real, this
    > behaves exactly as if case had been used instead. Since it doesn't add
    > any capabilities beyond case, there is less argument in favor of allowing
    > reals with casex and casez.
     
     What does 'disappear' mean?
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 09 2003 - 02:50:52 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.