Re: generate

From: Krishna Garlapati (krishna@synplicity.com)
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 09:49:15 PDT

  • Next message: Michael McNamara: "Re: errata/344: Case Statements with Real Expressions"

    Precedence: bulk

    This is exactly our request here. The new generate should be compliant
    to the 2001 standard unless there is a very strong reason for it not to.

    Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com wrote:

    >Precedence: bulk
    >
    >With respect to generate, I see that it is going to be difficult to retain full
    >back-compatibility with 1364-2001, i.e., that any code I write according to
    >verilog-2001 will still work in verilog-2005.
    >
    >However, I would like at least that some subset of 2001 code which still retains
    >full functionality still will work in verilog-2005.
    >
    >Some groups in Motorola want to start writing coding rules for verilog-2001
    >and we don't want to have to teach people to unlearn them a few years down the
    >line.
    >
    >
    > 

    -- 
- Krishna Garlapati, Synplicity Inc. (408)215-6152

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 09 2003 - 09:50:15 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.