Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?

From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Sun May 11 2003 - 07:40:03 PDT

  • Next message: Dennis Marsa: "Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/192; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    To: Dennis Marsa <drm@xilinx.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?
    Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 17:38:41 +0300

    > > 4. In 4.2.1, in para. 3, CHANGE
    > >
    > > "Both expressions shall be constant expressions."
    > >
    > > TO
    > >
    > > "Both expressions shall be constant integer expressions."
    >
    > I would propose:
    >
    > "Both the msb_expr and lsb_expr shall be constant integer expressions."
     
     OK
     
     
    > > In para. 5, CHANGE:
    > >
    > > "The width_expr shall be a constant expression."
    > >
    > > TO:
    > >
    > > "The width_expr shall be a constant integer expression". (Note: see errata/228.)
    >
    > I would propose:
    >
    > "Each of the msb_base_expr, lsb_base_expr and width_expr shall be constant integer expressions."
     
     No, only width_expr must be constant. msb_base and lsb_base may be variables.
     
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun May 11 2003 - 07:41:14 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.