Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?

From: Dennis Marsa (drm@xilinx.com)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 07:20:08 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/192; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Dennis Marsa <drm@xilinx.com>
    To: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/192: PROPOSAL - 3.3.1: are real values for ranges allowed?
    Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 08:13:56 -0600

     Shalom Bresticker wrote:
    >
    > Precedence: bulk
    >
    > The following reply was made to PR errata/192; it has been noted by GNATS.
    >
    > > > In para. 5, CHANGE:
    > > >
    > > > "The width_expr shall be a constant expression."
    > > >
    > > > TO:
    > > >
    > > > "The width_expr shall be a constant integer expression". (Note: see errata/228.)
    > >
    > > I would propose:
    > >
    > > "Each of the msb_base_expr, lsb_base_expr and width_expr shall be constant integer expressions."
    >
    > No, only width_expr must be constant. msb_base and lsb_base may be variables.
    >
     
     Yes. Thank you.
     
     How about:
     
     "The msb_base_expr and lsb_base_expr shall be integer expressions, and the width_expr
      shall be a constant integer expression."
     
     Dennis

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 12 2003 - 07:21:26 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.