RE: enhancement/386: ANALYZED - user defined functions on instantiations

From: Scott Cranston (cranston@cadence.com)
Date: Wed Aug 06 2003 - 08:50:06 PDT

  • Next message: Steven Sharp: "Re: enhancement/386: ANALYZED - user defined functions on instantiations"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR enhancement/386; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: "Scott Cranston" <cranston@cadence.com>
    To: <etf-bugs@boyd.com>
    Cc:
    Subject: RE: enhancement/386: ANALYZED - user defined functions on instantiations
    Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:46:11 -0400

     I was unaware of this...guess it's already supported then.
     
     
     +++-----Original Message-----
     +++From: Brad Pierce [mailto:Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com]
     +++Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:40 AM
     +++To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
     +++Subject: RE: enhancement/386: ANALYZED - user defined
     +++functions on instantiations
     +++
     +++
     +++Precedence: bulk
     +++
     +++The following reply was made to PR enhancement/386; it has
     +++been noted by GNATS.
     +++
     +++From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
     +++To: <etf-bugs@boyd.com>
     +++Cc:
     +++Subject: RE: enhancement/386: ANALYZED - user defined
     +++functions on instantiations
     +++Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:37:28 -0700
     +++
     +++ According to the third paragraph of V2K LRM Clause 4,
     +++constant expressions can include constant function calls
     +++(as defined in V2K LRM 10.3.5).
     +++
     +++
     +++
     +++
     +++
     +++

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 08:51:19 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.