Re: errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when a is a scalar?

From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Mon Aug 25 2003 - 02:00:00 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "errata/439: Syntax 6-2 should be titled "Syntax for variable declaration assignment""

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/261; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    To: Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when
     a is a scalar?
    Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:47:52 +0300

     I agree about adding the sentence, but I would prefer to add it at the END of
     the paragraph, after a similar sentence saying that bit-/part-selects of real
     variables are illegal.
     
     Shalom
     
    > In section 4.2.1, after the sentence
    >
    > "Bit-selects extract a particular bit from
    > a vector net, vector reg, integer variable,
    > or time variable."
    >
    > ADD
    >
    > "A bit-select or part-select of a scalar shall
    > be illegal."
    >
    > http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=261
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 25 2003 - 02:00:32 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.