Re: errata/452: 10.2.2, 10.3.1 -- 'reg' keyword in tf port declarations

From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 23:50:00 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/428: PROPOSAL - 2.5.1, value of 16'shc, request for clarification"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/452; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
    To: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/452: 10.2.2, 10.3.1 -- 'reg' keyword in tf port declarations
    Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:36:44 +0300

    > Does it change the meaning of a tf_input_declaration,
    > tf_output_declaration or tf_inout_declaration to add
    > the optional keyword 'reg'?
     
     It appears not.
     
     In fact, the LRM does not, but should, discuss the meaning of type declarations
     of task/func arguments,
     and what happens if they are not explicitly declared.
     
     This is important because in a module, an input and an inout cannot be a reg,
     whereas in task/func's, you cannot have wires.
     
     --
     Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
     Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
     Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
     POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
     
     
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Aug 27 2003 - 23:50:47 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.