From: Brad Pierce (Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com)
Date: Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:10:00 PDT
The following reply was made to PR errata/352; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Brad Pierce" <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Subject: RE: errata/352: PROPOSAL - 10.2.2 implies task arguments can be left off
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:59:38 -0700
I think the t() notation is a natural one for tasks of
no arguments. Why require a special notation for 0 args?
Also, t() is already supported by VCS and Design
How about? --
If the task definition has no arguments, a list of
arguments need not be provided. Otherwise, there shall
be an ordered list of expressions that matches the
order of the list of arguments in the task definition.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Thu Sep 04 2003 - 10:10:28 PDT
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.