Re: errata/237: PROPOSAL - A.7.5.3: scalar_timing_check_expressions has redundancies

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:00:03 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/88: 9.7.2 should say that event_controls can be expressions"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/237; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/237: PROPOSAL - A.7.5.3: scalar_timing_check_expressions
     has redundancies
    Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:45:56 +0300 (IDT)

     Please note that the proposal allows a complex expression to appear without
     parentheses. I do not think that is a problem, since the expression is
     preceded by &&& and followed by a comma.
     
    > REPLACE:
    > timing_check_condition ::=
    > scalar_timing_check_condition
    > | ( scalar_timing_check_condition )
    > WITH:
    > timing_check_condition ::=
    > expression
     
     Shalom
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:00:51 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.