Re: errata/462: A.1.1: "<file_path_spec" should be "file_path_spec"

From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:10:01 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "RE: errata/352: PROPOSAL - 10.2.2 implies task arguments can be left off"

    Precedence: bulk

    The following reply was made to PR errata/462; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
    To: Francoise Martinolle <fm@cadence.com>
    Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
    Subject: Re: errata/462: A.1.1: "<file_path_spec" should be "file_path_spec"
    Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:02:42 +0300 (IDT)

    > Also I noticed that file_path is not defined.
    >
    > file_path_spec ::= file_path
    > include_statement ::= include <file_path_spec> ;
     
     That is correct.
     It is one of those terms which does not have a formal syntactic definition.
     
     It is discussed in 13.2.1.
     
     There are a few other terms like that in the BNF.
     
     I would have deleted the line
     
    > file_path_spec ::= file_path
     
     except that we want to say that a file_path_spec may appear with or
     without quotation marks, so that we will get
     
     file_path_spec ::= file_path | "file_path"
     
     Issue #175 deals with defining when the quotation marks are required.
     
     --
     Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
     Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
     Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
     POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 05 2003 - 02:10:31 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.