- Previous message: Brad Pierce: "RE: errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when a is a scalar?"
- Maybe in reply to: Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com: "errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when a is a scalar?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Precedence: bulk
The following reply was made to PR errata/261; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
To: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com>
Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Subject: RE: errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0]
when a is a scalar?
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 10:54:17 +0300 (IDT)
Brad,
This was already fixed in #177.
Shalom
> If this proposal is accepted, then a change will be required in the fix
> for issue 11, which twice assumes that the scalar "ba" can be referred
> to by "ba[0]".
--
Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
- Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: enhancement/455: Jeda Verification Enhancements"
- Previous message: Brad Pierce: "RE: errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when a is a scalar?"
- Maybe in reply to: Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com: "errata/261: PROPOSAL - Clarify whether a is the same as a[0:0] when a is a scalar?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Sun Sep 07 2003 - 01:03:02 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.