From: Michael McNamara (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 16:02:36 PDT
-- On Sep 9 2003 at 08:50, Brad Pierce sent a message:
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
> Subject: "Re: Minutes of the September 8, 2003 ETF meeting"
> I think the proposal for 415 needs a revision by the VSG.
> >415: Shalom moved, James seconded; none opposed, none abstain; hence
> > the motion passes.
> Although I still agree that constant_function_call can and ought to
> be removed from module_path_primary and primary, I think that the
> system_function_calls need to be retained.
> Only system_function_identifiers can start with a '$' and only
> a system_function_call can include a system_function_identifier.
> -- Brad
Actually the purpose of this motion was based on the assertion of fact
that the function_call production in the BNF already includes
constant_function_call and system_function_call, so it is redundant to
include these items in again in the definition of a primary.
If this isn't the case, then absolutely there is a revision needed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 13:42:25 PDT
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.