From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:27:42 PDT
Precedence: bulk
No, I think Brad is correct.
The function_call production in the BNF is not defined as including
"| system_function_call". I missed this one.
Thanks, Brad.
Shalom
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Michael McNamara wrote:
> -- On Sep 9 2003 at 08:50, Brad Pierce sent a message:
> >
> > I think the proposal for 415 needs a revision by the VSG.
> >
> > Although I still agree that constant_function_call can and ought to
> > be removed from module_path_primary and primary, I think that the
> > system_function_calls need to be retained.
> >
> > Only system_function_identifiers can start with a '$' and only
> > a system_function_call can include a system_function_identifier.
>
> Actually the purpose of this motion was based on the assertion of fact
> that the function_call production in the BNF already includes
> constant_function_call and system_function_call, so it is redundant to
> include these items in again in the definition of a primary.
>
> If this isn't the case, then absolutely there is a revision needed.
>
> Shalom?
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 23:39:20 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.