From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Mon Sep 22 2003 - 01:20:01 PDT
Precedence: bulk
The following reply was made to PR errata/73; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom Bresticker <Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com>
To: Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
Cc: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Subject: Re: errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 12:07:35 +0300
A few quibbles:
Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com wrote:
> In 4.1.4,
4.1.14
> CHANGE
>
> "Another form of concatenation is the replication
> operation. The first expression shall be a non-zero,
> non-X and non-Z constant expression, the second
> follows the rules for concatenation."
>
> TO
>
> "An operator that can be applied only to concatenations
> is replication, which is expressed by a concatenation
> preceded by a nonzero, non-X and non-Z constant
Should be "positive" instead of "nonzero". See #76.
> expression, enclosed together within brace
> characters, and which indicates a joining together
> of that many copies of the concatenation. Unlike
> true concatenations, including nested concatenations,
What is a "true" concatentation? Maybe "regular" concatenations, instead?
"nested concatenations" have not been mentioned yet.
> expressions containing replications can neither
> be assigned to nor connected to output or inout
> ports."
Sounds like it says,
"can neither be assigned to output or inout ports nor .."
How about something like
"shall not appear on the left-hand size of an assignment"?
(Note that the language should be "shall not" instead of "can not".)
The rest looks OK.
Shalom
--
Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268
Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Sep 22 2003 - 01:22:38 PDT
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.