errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue

From: Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:30:14 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "Re: errata/276: PROPOSAL - BNF A.6.4 doesn't allow fork/join in functions"

    Precedence: bulk

    In 4.1.14,

    CHANGE

      "Another form of concatenation is the replication
       operation. The first expression shall be a non-zero,
       non-X and non-Z constant expression, the second
       follows the rules for concatenation."

    TO

      "An operator that can be applied only to concatenations
       is replication, which is expressed by a concatenation
       preceded by a positive, non-X and non-Z constant
       expression, enclosed together within brace
       characters, and which indicates a joining together
       of that many copies of the concatenation. Unlike
       regular concatenations, expressions containing
       replications shall not appear on the left-hand
       side of an assignment and shall not be connected
       to output or inout ports."

    and in the example that follows these sentences,

    CHANGE

      "// This is equivalent to"

    TO

      "// This yields the same value as"

    and in the final example of 4.1.14,

    CHANGE

      "nested concatenations"

    TO
      "a replication nested within a concatenation"

    and

    CHANGE

      "// This is equivalent to"

    TO

      "// This yields the same value as"

    http://boydtechinc.com/cgi-bin/issueproposal.pl?cmd=view&pr=73

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 21:33:49 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.