From: Steven Sharp (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:30:00 PDT
The following reply was made to PR errata/73; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Steven Sharp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: email@example.com, Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:24:51 -0400 (EDT)
I have now reviewed Brad's proposal, and I think it makes the situation clear.
It does not list all of the possible lvalue situations where a replication
would not be allowed, but a full list would probably cause more confusion
than it prevented. The longer comment text might cause some formatting
problems. We could use something shorter but less clear, like
"// Same value as", or let the editor worry about it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:31:32 PDT
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.