errata/73: Re: errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue

From: Steven Sharp (sharp@cadence.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:30:00 PDT

  • Next message: Shalom Bresticker: "errata/73: Re: errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue"

    The following reply was made to PR errata/73; it has been noted by GNATS.

    From: Steven Sharp <sharp@cadence.com>
    To: etf-bugs@boyd.com, Brad.Pierce@synopsys.com
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: errata/73: PROPOSAL - 4.1.14 implies replication legal lvalue
    Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 21:24:51 -0400 (EDT)

     I have now reviewed Brad's proposal, and I think it makes the situation clear.
     It does not list all of the possible lvalue situations where a replication
     would not be allowed, but a full list would probably cause more confusion
     than it prevented. The longer comment text might cause some formatting
     problems. We could use something shorter but less clear, like
     "// Same value as", or let the editor worry about it.
     
     Steven Sharp
     sharp@cadence.com
     

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:31:32 PDT and
    sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.