- Previous message: Michael McNamara: "A big Thank You for all of your effort of 1364-2001 Version C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
The following reply was made to PR errata/416; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com
To: etf-bugs@boyd.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: errata/416: check use of constant_expression
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:25:01 +0200 (IST)
In addition, the text at the beginning of Section 4 which defines the term
"constant expression" should explicitly list all its restrictions, such as
no hierarchical references.
Shalom
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com wrote:
> Need to check everywhere that constant_expression is used in BNF, that it
> really does need to obey all the restrictions of constant_expressions,
> such as no hierarchical references, etc.
>
> Need to distinguish in text between constant expressions which have such
> restrictions and those which do not.
- Next message: Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com: "Re: errata/140: PROPOSAL - Section 4.1.5: Definition of power operator result type (fwd)"
- Previous message: Michael McNamara: "A big Thank You for all of your effort of 1364-2001 Version C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Mon Dec 22 2003 - 00:20:08 PST
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.