From: Shalom Bresticker (Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com)
Date: Sun Feb 08 2004 - 02:46:02 PST
As I remember, in our internal discussions, we pretty much came to the conclusion
that the description of the alogorithm is not just acceptable, but necessary.
Shalom
Jason Woolf wrote:
> The main reason for Section 12.8 was the problem discussed in the second
> half of the section, where the hierarchical name in a defparam has to be
> resolved before the heirarchy is done expanding (see example at the end
> of the section). So, with that in mind, do we feel it is acceptable to have
> the breadth-first algorithm described in the LRM?
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker@motorola.com Design & Reuse Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Motorola Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 441478
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4
: Sun Feb 08 2004 - 02:32:45 PST
and
sponsored by Boyd Technology, Inc.